Publications
Federal Overtime Revisions Moving Forward
In late November, opponents of the proposed federal rules that would change overtime pay provisions abandoned their attempts to block the rules from going forward. The proposed changes had faced strong opposition from labor unions and had divided Democrats and Republicans along party lines. It is now likely that the revisions will go into effect in 2004.
The Proposed Changes.
Although the Department of Labor has touted the proposed changes as providing overtime pay for 1.3 million “low-wage” workers not previously eligible for the pay, for the most part the revisions seem to benefit employers. More employees may be eligible for overtime pay because the salary threshold would increase from $155 a week to $425 a week. However, under the proposed changes, workers earning $65,000 a year or more and performing non-manual tasks would likely be ineligible for overtime.
Determining whether someone is exempt under the administrative exemption may become an easier task under the proposed changes, as well. Most notably, the requirement that such an employee exercise “discretion and independent judgment” would be replaced with a requirement that he/she have a “position of responsibility.” While still not a precise standard, there appears to be a consensus that more workers would now fall within the exemption. The professional exemption is also arguably broadened under the proposed changes. Rather than requiring the exercise of advanced knowledge acquired by a prolonged course of specialized study, the new test would allow employees to qualify for the exemption by showing a combination of schooling and work experience.
Employers would also be granted greater freedom to impose unpaid disciplinary suspensions on exempt workers. Currently, employers may only deduct from pay for suspensions of less than a full week if they are the result of a violation of a major safety rule. Suspensions for sexually harassing conduct, for example, do not fall within this provision. Under the proposed changes, employers would be able to impose unpaid disciplinary suspensions of one or more full days for violations of written policies, unrelated to
safety.
safety.
What This Means For Connecticut Employers.
What, if anything, these changes would mean to Connecticut employers is unclear. While the proposed changes would impact interpretation of federal law, there are no similar changes pending at the state level. It is likely, at least initially, that the Connecticut Department of Labor (DOL) would continue to interpret and apply state law as it has in the past.
It is imperative, then, that when and if the federal revisions are finalized, Connecticut employers remain cautious. A wholesale change in exempt/non-exempt classifications would be unwise until the Connecticut DOL provides better guidance on what, if any, impact these changes will have on Connecticut employers.