by Christine Stackhouse | Feb 26, 2025
In Republic of Hungary v. Simon (No. 23-867), the Supreme Court addressed, for the second time, whether Jewish survivors of the Hungarian Holocaust have alleged enough facts to pierce the sovereign immunity of Hungary and its state-owned railway. And just as it did...
by Jennifer Hill | Feb 14, 2025
The potential for antitrust challenges brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) or the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is well known among deal-making parties. However, parties should also keep in mind two lesser-known antitrust issues when seeking...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jan 24, 2025
Well, that was fast. In the blink of an eye last week, TikTok—the social-media platform used by over 170 million Americans but owned by a foreign company with connections to the Chinese government—went dark in the United States. This followed the Supreme Court’s per...
by Jennifer Hill | Jan 17, 2025
Partner Jolie Apicella authored the article titled, “Challenges to 340B and States’ Laws Will Impact the Future Scope of the Law” for the January/February issue of the Journal of Health Care Compliance, Volume 27, Number 1. Jolie reviews and assesses...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jan 17, 2025
In Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger (No. 23-677), the Supreme Court resolved a jurisdictional dog fight over dog food. If a plaintiff files a complaint containing state- and federal-law claims, the complaint can ordinarily be removed to federal court, and that...
