Supreme Court Update: Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group, Inc. (No. 18-1086)

by Misha | May 15, 2020

Greetings, Court Fans! Most of the attention this week was on the Court’s final set of arguments for the OT2019 term, including arguments in the two Trump-related subpoena cases. This time, the Court’s teleconference arguments went a bit more smoothly, with fewer...

Supreme Court Update: New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. City of New York (No. 18-280), Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (No. 18-1150), Maine Community Health Options v. United States, No. 18-1023

by Kelsey Barcomb | May 1, 2020

Greetings, Court Fans! As we noted a few days ago, the Court issued three new decisions early this week, including in a much-anticipated Second Amendment case (the first such case to reach the Court in a decade). We’re now back to summarize those decisions. There’s a...

Supreme Court Update: Romag Fasteners v. Fossil (No. 18-1233), County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260), Barton v. Barr (No. 18-725)

by Kelsey Barcomb | Apr 28, 2020

Greetings, Court Fans! We’re back with the three lagging decisions from last week. But first, we’ve got three more decisions to pass on, which were handed down today. In New York State Rifle and Pistol Assn. v. City of New York (No. 18-280), the first Second Amendment...

Supreme Court Update: Ramos v. Louisiana (No. 18-5924), Atlantic Richfield v. Christian (No. 17-1498), Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies (No. 18-916)

by Kelsey Barcomb | Apr 27, 2020

Greetings, Court Fans! It was a busy week at the Court this week, as The Nine released opinions on two separate days, something it usually doesn’t do until June. Unfortunately, given their length and complexity, we’re only able to bring you full summaries of Monday’s...

Supreme Court Update: Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee (No. 19A1016), Babb v. Wilkie (No. 18-882), Kansas v. Glover (No. 18-556)

by Misha | Apr 13, 2020

Greetings, Court Fans! Two more decisions in argued cases this week, both 8-1 opinions on narrow grounds, though in widely different contexts. But it was the Court’s sharply divided 5-4 decision granting an emergency stay application that garnered the most attention....