by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! As we reported earlier in the week, The Nine handed down one of the most hotly anticipated decisions of the term on Monday, and boy did it deliver! Wait. Sorry, strike that. It turns out the 7-2 decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! The Nine kicked off the week with four new decisions, though only three came with signed opinions. In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute (No. 16-980), the Court held (5-4) that Ohio’s “use it or lose it” practice of...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! This morning, the Court made some headway (emphasis on “some”) on the roughly two dozen cases left to decide by the end of the month. Specifically, in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky (No. 16-1435), the Court held 7-2 that...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! The Nine chipped away at The Nineteen (cases remaining) this morning, but not without lacing up their punting boots. In one of the most hotly anticipated cases of the year (and the longest pending, having been argued on the first day of the...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! As we await tomorrow’s batch of opinions, let’s take a moderately deep dive into Monday’s partisan-gerrymandering decisions, Gill v. Whitford (No. 16-1161) and Benisek v. Lamone (No. 17-333). As we reported earlier, the Supreme...
