Wiggin
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
  • Contact Us
Wiggin

  • Home
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
    • Careers
      • Law Students
      • Lateral Attorneys
      • Paralegals
      • Professionals and Staff
      • Current Openings
    • Alumni
    • Pro Bono
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
    • News & Resources
      • Firm News
      • Publications
      • Blogs
      • Podcasts
      • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Pro Bono
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
  • News & Resources
    • Firm News
    • Publications
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Events
Find a Person
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z View All

Supreme Court Update: Kindred Nursing Centers L.P. v. Clark (16-32); Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson (16-348) and Howell v. Howell (15-1031)

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court Fans! The Court rang in the week with three more decisions—Cooper v. Harris (No. 15-1262), an important ruling clarifying the test for racial gerrymandering claims; TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (No. 16-1341), an important ruling...

Supreme Court Update: Cooper v. Harris (15-1262), TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Grp. (16-341) and Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon (16-254)

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court Fans! We’re back with summaries of the three decisions handed down this past week, beginning with a major ruling on racial gerrymandering. Cooper v. Harris (15-1262) is one of two significant redistricting cases that were argued on the same day...

Supreme Court Update: Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. (15-1189), County of Los Angeles v. Mendez (16-369), Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions (16-54) and BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell (16-405)

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court Fans! The Court packed four new opinions into this holiday-shortened week, including the first case to be decided by nine justices in sixteen months. In that case, BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell (No. 16-405), The Nine held that the Federal...

Supreme Court Update: Kokesh v. SEC (16-529), Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates (16-605), and North Carolina v. Covington (16-1023)

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court Fans! The Court took care of some deck clearing this week, handing down five unanimous decisions in relatively uncontroversial cases, including Honeycutt v. United States (No. 16-142), on the applicability of federal forfeiture statutes to members of...

Supreme Court Update: Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (16-349), Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton (16-74), Honeycutt v. United States, (16-142), Virginia v. LeBlanc (16-1177), and Order List

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court Fans! Four new decisions to start the week, including the first ever authored by Justice Gorsuch: Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (No. 16-349), holding that a company seeking to collect its own debt is not a “debt collector” under...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Subscribe
  • Extranet
  • Payments
  • Privacy Notice

Follow Us:

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

©2026 Wiggin and Dana LLP, All Rights Reserved.