by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! Today, we bring you Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper (10-1024), in which the Court determined that people harmed by violations of the federal Privacy Act may sue the government only for economic injuries, not mental or emotional...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! Today we bring you a double-header with decisions on arrestee searches, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington (10-945), and immunity from § 1983 suits for grand jury witnesses, Rehberg v. Paulk (10-788). If the...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to round out our coverage of the Court’s recent activity, with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds (10-1261), considering tolling of the time to bring suits against corporate insiders for...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! In the spirit of jurisprudential unity, today we bring you two unanimous decisions: Filarsky v. Delia (10-1018), holding that a private individual retained by the government to carry out its work may seek qualified immunity under § 1983,...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! The unanimous decisions continued last week with Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S (10-844), holding that a generic drug manufacturer may bring a counterclaim against a brand-name drug manufacturer for providing an...
