by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We are back with United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC (11-139), a potentially significant administrative law decision masquerading as a ho-hum Internal Revenue Code statute of limitations case; Hall v. United States (10-875), where a...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! This Update will clear out one backlogged case: Wood v. Milyard (10-9995), an important read for habeas procedure junkies, and two of the Court’s five decisions last week: Astrue v. Capato (11-159), holding that children conceived via in...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! As usual for this time of year, the Court has been busy issuing decisions. This Update will bring you: Blueford v. Arkansas (10-1320), holding that Double Jeopardy does not apply when a jury continues deliberating after announcing that it is...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! In today’s Update, we bring you two of the Court’s recent decisions: Reichle v. Howards (11-262), holding that Secret Service agents were entitled to qualified immunity with respect to an allegation of retaliatory arrest in violation...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! This Update will bring you two per curiam habeas decisions, Coleman v. Johnson (11-1052) and Parker v. Matthews (11-845), as well as a number of recent cert grants. (Hey, they can’t all be news breakers!) In Coleman v. Johnson (11-1052),...
