by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! The Nine have managed to outpace us over the last two weeks, but now that they’re on April Break, it’s time for us to catch up. In this installment, we’ll cover Nielsen v. Preap (No. 16-1363), on discretionary bond for certain “criminal aliens”;...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Wiggin and Dana Partner, Jody Erdfarb, authored, Top Five Tips for Surviving a Connecticut Medicaid Audit, which appeared in the Connecticut Association of Optometrists First Quarter 2019 Newsletter. To read the full article, please click on the...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! We’re back with the second installment of our April catch-up series, bringing you summaries of Bucklew v. Pettigrew (No. 17-8151), Biestek v. Berryhill (No. 17-1184), Lorenzo v. Securities Exchange Commission (No. 17-1077), and Sturgeon v. Frost...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court Fans! One of the big narratives of OT2018 has been growing divisiveness between the Justices over the death penalty, attributable in no small part to the departure of Justice Kennedy, who regularly served as the swing vote in such cases (often, though...