by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to round out our coverage of the Court’s recent activity, with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds (10-1261), considering tolling of the time to bring suits against corporate insiders for...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! In the spirit of jurisprudential unity, today we bring you two unanimous decisions: Filarsky v. Delia (10-1018), holding that a private individual retained by the government to carry out its work may seek qualified immunity under § 1983,...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! The unanimous decisions continued last week with Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S (10-844), holding that a generic drug manufacturer may bring a counterclaim against a brand-name drug manufacturer for providing an...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We are back with United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC (11-139), a potentially significant administrative law decision masquerading as a ho-hum Internal Revenue Code statute of limitations case; Hall v. United States (10-875), where a...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! This Update will clear out one backlogged case: Wood v. Milyard (10-9995), an important read for habeas procedure junkies, and two of the Court’s five decisions last week: Astrue v. Capato (11-159), holding that children conceived via in...
