Wiggin
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
  • Contact Us
Wiggin

  • Home
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
    • Careers
      • Law Students
      • Lateral Attorneys
      • Paralegals
      • Professionals and Staff
      • Current Openings
    • Alumni
    • Pro Bono
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
    • News & Resources
      • Firm News
      • Publications
      • Blogs
      • Podcasts
      • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Pro Bono
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
  • News & Resources
    • Firm News
    • Publications
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Events
Find a Person
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z View All

Supreme Court Update: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (09-987), Cullen v. Pinholster (09-1088) and Order List

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! The Court issued two significant decisions this week: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (09-987), limiting taxpayer standing to bring Establishment Clause challenges, and Cullen v. Pinholster (09-1088), holding that, on...

Supreme Court Update: Sossamon v. Texas (08-1438) and Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart (09-529)

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! Last week, the Court issued a pair of decisions on state sovereign immunity, Sossamon v. Texas (08-1438) and Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart (09-529). In Sossamon v. Texas (08-1438), the Court held 6-2 that States did not...

Supreme Court Update: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (09-893), United States v. Tohono O’Odham Nation (09-846) and Order List

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! This Update will bring you two decisions and all recent orders. We’ll start with the Court’s controversial 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (09-893), which held that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act...

Supreme Court Update: Kentucky v. King (09-1272), Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Kirk (10-188) and CIGNA Corp. v. Amara (09-804)

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! We’re back with three cases with a little something for everyone: Kentucky v. King (09-1272), on the exigent circumstances exception to warrantless search; Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Kirk (10-188), on the public...

Supreme Court Update: Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (10-98), United States v. Tinklenberg (09-1498), and Bobby v. Mitts (10-1000)

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! The decisions are washing ashore in waves now as we make our way into June. This Update wades through: Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (10-98), holding that former Attorney General Ashcroft could not be sued for allegedly instituting a policy to use...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Subscribe
  • Extranet
  • Payments
  • Privacy Notice

Follow Us:

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

©2026 Wiggin and Dana LLP, All Rights Reserved.