by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Companies disclosing proprietary compound information must take steps to protect their interest in such information. Equally important, but often overlooked, companies receiving another party’s proprietary information also need to take steps to avoid being...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
The United Kingdom (UK) voted June 23, 2016 to exit the European Union (EU). While the full impact of the vote will not be known for some time, we are circulating our initial impression how the “Brexit” could impact our clients’ intellectual property...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
On May 18, 2016, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued a Final Rule implementing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), which prohibits discrimination on...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Enhanced Damages – Halo In June 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics (14-1513), in which it addressed the Federal Circuit’s test for determining whether enhanced damages should be awarded for patent...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
By now, nearly everyone in higher education knows that the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the University of Texas’s race-conscious admissions policy, turning back an effort to derail affirmative action. But the Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas,...
