by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 23, 2023
Greetings, Court Fans! It’s been a busy couple days at the Court, with eight decisions issued in the last two days, nearly all of which were closely divided and came out in favor of the Court’s conservative wing: Pugin v. Garland (No. 22-23), a 6-3 decision (with...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 22, 2023
On June 11, 2023, Partner Robert Hoff and Associate Chloe Booth authored an article in the American Bar Association Litigation Section titled “Privilege, Work Product, and Kovel: An Update from Recent Case Law.” Robert and Chloe discuss the importance of...
by Kelly Sweeney | Jun 22, 2023
Partners Paul Hughes and Evan Kipperman recently published an article in Law360 discussing the tradeoffs of corporate venture capital investments on both the investor and entrepreneur sides. They note, “One of the greatest advantages of the corporate venture...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 20, 2023
Greetings, Court Fans! Hope you enjoyed a meaningful Juneteenth! We’re back with summaries of some of last week’s decisions: Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski (No. 21-806), where the Court held that §1983 allows plaintiffs to enforce rights...
by Kelly Sweeney | Jun 16, 2023
The U.S. Supreme Court issued, on June 8, 2023, its decision in the much-watched Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC case (Case No. 22-148). The decision holds that the parody defense is not as all-encompassing as perhaps once believed, and...
