Wiggin
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
  • Contact Us
Wiggin

  • Home
  • People
  • Services
  • Firm
    • Careers
      • Law Students
      • Lateral Attorneys
      • Paralegals
      • Professionals and Staff
      • Current Openings
    • Alumni
    • Pro Bono
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
    • News & Resources
      • Firm News
      • Publications
      • Blogs
      • Podcasts
      • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Pro Bono
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Wiggin Opportunity Initiative
  • News & Resources
    • Firm News
    • Publications
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Events
Find a Person
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z View All

Supreme Court Update: Mississippi v. AU Optronics (12-1036), Daimler AG v. Bauman (11-965), Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund (12-992) and Order List

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! In this first Update of the new year, we bring you three significant decisions and a number of cert grants. On the decision front, we have Mississippi v. AU Optronics (12-1036), in which the Court ruled that parens patriae suits brought by...

Supreme Court Update: Burrage v. United States (12-7515), Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper (12-315) and Order List

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! We have two new summaries for you in this edition, with two more to come shortly. First up is Burrage v. United States (12-7515), which held that a drug dealer who supplied only one of many drugs to a drug user who ultimately dies or is...

Supreme Court Update: Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. (12-417) and Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC (12-1128)

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! As promised, we’re back to wrap things up with two more decisions: Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. (12-417), on what constitutes “changing clothes” under the Fair Labor Standards Act; and Medtronic v. Mirowski Family...

Supreme Court Update: Fernandez v. California (12-7822), United States v. Apel (12-1038) and Hinton v. Alabama (13-6440)

by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! The Court returned from its midwinter recess this week, issuing a slew of new opinions. We’re going to break things up and bring them to you in bite-sized chunks. Today’s Update will cover Fernandez v. California (12-7822), a Fourth...

Supreme Court Update: Walden v. Fiore (12-574), Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice (12-79) and Kaley v. United States (12-464)

by S Z | Sep 15, 2019

Greetings, Court fans! We’re back with the three remaining decisions from last week: Walden v. Fiore (12-574), refining matters of personal jurisdiction; Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice (12-79), permitting state law class actions to proceed against various...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Subscribe
  • Extranet
  • Payments
  • Privacy Notice

Follow Us:

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

©2026 Wiggin and Dana LLP, All Rights Reserved.