by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to clear out more of last week’s deluge of decisions. This Update will wade through three criminal decisions – Bailey v. United States (11-770), considering how close is close enough to the scene of the search to allow...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! This Update will tackle Gabelli v. SEC (11-1274), holding that the SEC has 5 years (and no more) to bring a claim for civil penalties under the Investment Advisers Act; Evans v. Michigan (11-1327), finding that double jeopardy barred retrial of...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to bring you two more decisions from last week, both fairly significant: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA (11-1025), a standing decision making it much less likely that government wiretapping under FISA will face scrutiny in...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to round out our coverage of recent decisions and orders, including Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds (11-1085), on whether securities fraud plaintiffs must establish the materiality of the allegedly...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back with the first game of a triple-header. In this round, we’ll bring you Florida v. Jardines (11-564), considering whether a police dog’s hunt for the scent of drugs constitutes a search for Fourth Amendment purposes...
