by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to bring you two more decisions from last week, both fairly significant: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA (11-1025), a standing decision making it much less likely that government wiretapping under FISA will face scrutiny in...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back to round out our coverage of recent decisions and orders, including Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds (11-1085), on whether securities fraud plaintiffs must establish the materiality of the allegedly...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! We’re back with the first game of a triple-header. In this round, we’ll bring you Florida v. Jardines (11-564), considering whether a police dog’s hunt for the scent of drugs constitutes a search for Fourth Amendment purposes...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! On to part two of this week’s reporting. After handing the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar a victory in Amgen just a few weeks back, the Court gave the class action defense bar a couple reasons to cheer with its decisions in...
by Wiggin and Dana LLP | Sep 15, 2019
Greetings, Court fans! It’s time to get up to speed on some recent decisions. In this edition, we have US Airways v. McCutchen [11-1285], in which the Court held that equitable doctrines did not trump an ERISA plan’s terms, and Marshall v. Rodgers...
