by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 28, 2024
Greetings, Court Fans! Today, on what we now know is the penultimate day of the term, the Court issued three opinions, all of which are both big and split 6-3 on (mostly) ideological lines: In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (No. 22-451), decided along with...
by Kelly Sweeney | Jun 28, 2024
August 1, 2024 (Update): The following client alert was published in Westlaw Today. To read the publication, click here. Our previous client alert on May 22, 2024, discussed the passage of Public Act No. 24-76, which was signed by Governor Lamont on May 11, 2024. This...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 28, 2024
On June 26, 2024, Partner David Hall and Associate Christopher Bailes authored the article titled, “DOJ’s Indictments of Congressional Members Signals Evolving Strategy to Fight Public Corruption” for the Legal Intelligencer. David and Christopher discuss...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 27, 2024
Greetings, Court Fans! The Court issued four significant decisions this morning: Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. (No. 23-124), holding (5-4, with an interesting “horseshoe” alignment) that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize nonconsensual releases of claims...
by Christine Stackhouse | Jun 26, 2024
Greetings, Court Fans! With fourteen cases left to decide as of yesterday (give or take, depending on which, if any, are consolidated), we were expecting quite a few opinion announcements this morning. Instead, we got just two: Murthy v. Missouri (No. 23-411), holding...
