by Christine Stackhouse | May 23, 2023
Greetings, Court Fans! Thursday was another busy day at the Court, seeing the release of six (fine, five-plus) decisions: In Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (No. 21-869), a 7-2 Court held, in a lengthy decision expounding on the “purpose and character” prong of...
by Kelly Sweeney | May 17, 2023
The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (“EEOC”) updated its COVID-19 Technical Assistance in view of the declaration by the U.S. government that the COVID-19 public health emergency has ended. As the EEOC Chair announced, “The end of the public health emergency...
by Christine Stackhouse | May 15, 2023
Greetings, Court Fans! After a month of inactivity, The Nine were back on Thursday with five new decisions, including a few biggies: In National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (No. 21-468), a divided Court upheld a California animal-rights proposition that would...
by Christine Stackhouse | May 15, 2023
On May 12 2023, Medical Economics published an interview with Partner Jolie Apicella. In the interview, titled, “Private equity investment could lead to better health care, but expect more oversight as money pours in,” Jolie discusses what physicians should know about...
by Christine Stackhouse | May 2, 2023
On May 2, 2023, Partner Michael Kasdan and Consulting Counsel Takao Saito co-authored an article in The Patent Lawyer titled, “Developments in global SEP/FRAND litigation and licensing: the London High Court’s decision in InterDigital v Lenovo.” Michael...
